Thursday, February 20, 2014

Evolution, Creation, Science, Theology, Truth

A spike of attention given recently to a evolution vs. creationism debate between Creation Museum president Ken Ham and Bill Nye “the science guy” made me thankful for my faith tradition, and for the memory of Ian Barbour. More about Barbour in a moment.

The debate, in case you haven’t heard about it, pitted Bill Nye, who advocated the scientific approach of critical thinking and hypothesis testing, against Ken Ham, who advocates finding “answers in Genesis.” Ken Ham believes that the Bible is literally true, without errors of any kind. To him, that means that the universe is around 6,000 years old, and that the earth and all living things (including humans) were created in the span of six days.

One of the issues that I have with “answers in Genesis” is that Ken Ham seems to be asking questions that Genesis was never intended to answer. (A second issue comes later.)

What was missing in the debate were the many voices of faithful Christians and faithful people of other religions who see no conflict between scientific and theological (choose your word…) truth, knowledge, understanding.  This is the tradition in which I was raised, in the United Church of Christ, although certainly not limited to our denomination.

Which brings be to Ian Barbour, professor of science and religion, and member of the United Church of Christ, who passed away last month at the age of 90. In a wonderful obituary from theNew York Times:

He was well known for describing four prevailing views of the relationship between science and religion: that they fundamentally conflict, that they are separate domains, that the complexity of science affirms divine guidance and finally — the approach he preferred — that science and religion should be viewed as being engaged in a constructive dialogue with each other.“This requires humility on both sides,” he wrote. “Scientists have to acknowledge that science does not have all the answers, and theologians have to recognize the changing historical contexts of theological reflection.”

My second issue with the approach that Ken Ham takes is that a focus on Genesis for accurate chronology about the origins of the universe and life actually distracts us from the intention of Genesis. The opening chapter of Genesis is a poetic, liturgical celebration of all that exists. It is meant to evoke wonder and praise, and to assure us of a theological truth, which is repeated at the end of each day of creation. The truth is this: everything that God has created is good. There is no inherent evil. There is no meaningless existence. There is only what has been created by God for good. 

Thursday, February 13, 2014

Faith at the Movies in 2013

When we think about our lives – what we value, what is right and wrong, what gives us meaning – we can get very precise and analytical using the language of theology, ethics, and philosophical terms. There’s a place for that, but we what we really need are stories: parables, novels, fables, and, yes, movies. This is the movie award season, and my annual look at faith in the movies of the past year.

You may have missed Philomena . If you did, I urge you to find a way to see it. Based on a true story, Judi Dench plays Philomena, a woman who tries to reconnect with her child who was adopted from the judgmental convent in Ireland where she gave birth to him. Records have been destroyed, but a journalist helps her to rekindle her search. This movie shows the variety and complexity of Christian faith. Some of the nuns are very cruel in their vindictive judgment, but Philomena herself, despite the harm she suffered, has a mature faith that seeks to live with joy and mercy, even when it is hard.

In one of the best moments, the journalist is amazed by Philomena’s forgiveness for the people who did her harm. He doesn’t believe that they deserve her forgiveness, and he says to Philomena something like “Forgive? You’re going to do it just like that?!” 
Philomena snaps back “It’s not ‘just like that.’ That’s hard! That’s hard for me.”
What a wonderful window into the life of faith, so simple and yet so brave, so demanding of strength beyond our own.

 
In the movie 12 Years A Slave, we are reminded of the horror of American slavery, and reminded that the Christian faith was used to justify and maintain the institution of slavery. On more than one slave plantation, we see what passes for a Sunday morning Christian service which consists of the slave owner reading to the slaves
from the Bible, and always choosing the passages about obedience to the master. These are heartbreaking scenes. They are a powerful reminder that we need to be very careful and critical in our understanding of what scripture means. Just because someone says that this is what it means does not make that the final word.




Finally, Gravity was a beautiful and visually stunning movie about the danger and isolation of astronauts in space, orbiting our planet. It is also a story of the weight of grief, and a metaphor that reminds us that grief can feel like a death of our former life. It also reminds us that beyond death there is new life, a rebirth. It is not an overtly religious movie, but that is the good news of our faith.

Monday, January 27, 2014

Text and Subtext

I once found myself giving a long and detailed description to my twenty-year-old stepson about how to install a new toilet. I'd asked him to help me with it so that I could teach him, having only recently learned it myself. But the one I'd bought had a different way of mounting the tank and I soon found that my confident and knowledgeable lesson was breaking down into lots of thoughts along the lines of “now, let's see here...” and “let me just look at the diagram again....” It was not my finest parental lesson, and my son's interest was understandably lowering.

At some point, it was necessary for me to give up on the text of the lesson and get down to the subtext of the moment, which is what was really important in the first place. Text and subtext are terms I borrow from literary work. The text is the actual content of the words. In this case, the text had to do with the setting of screws in the base of the toilet. The subtext is the unspoken message which is being conveyed under and behind the text. Nine times out of ten, or maybe all ten times, the subtext is the more important part of the message. For me, the subtext of my bad plumbing lesson contained several messages.
1.      You're growing up and I want you to be prepared for adulthood.
2.      I wish I'd learned more about taking care of a house when I was growing up.
3.      I love you, and I want to teach you what I have to pass on.

That's a lot to pack into a lesson on installing a toilet, and when the lesson broke down, I decided I'd just tell him those things, in more or less the words I just used. These were not new messages to him, but they were worth saying out loud again.

I've been thinking about the subtext of some of the things we do at church.

Text: We have ministry programs for children and youth = Subtext: we want a safe and nurturing place for the young people we love.

Text: We have a writing group for elders = Subtext: we value our life stories, and we believe that if we listen closely and honestly to our stories, we will hear the story of God.

Text: We work with outreach partners locally and around the world = Subtext: all people are our neighbors. Even if they are strangers to us, they are relatives in the family of God.


Those are just a few, but you get the point. These are not new messages, but they are worth saying out loud as often as we can.

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

Singing Christmas

We were singing the Christmas carols from memory. Someone would call out a name, and we would all sing the first verse together (the first verse seems to be the most we can manage from memory).

Stock photo for dramatization (not me)

The First Noel
O Come, All Ye Faithful
Hark! The Herald Angels Sing
Away in a Manger

Then someone said “Go Tell it on the Mountain” and we all started to sing the refrain:
“Go tell it on the Mountain, over the hills and everywhere;
Go tell in on the mountain…” but there was confusion at the end.

“…that Jesus Christ was born” sang some.
“…that Jesus Christ is born” sang others.

The first one makes sense. We are the carol singers, and we are singing with joy because of the day long ago when Jesus Christ was born. Past tense. It is the day we remember every year, the day when the word of God became flesh and dwelt among us.

But that isn’t how the lyrics go. We sing in present tense: “Go tell it on the mountain, that Jesus Christ is born!”

If we think about Christmas in the past tense, we miss the message. Christ comes to be among us in our own time. Christ is born in whatever place will make room for God -actually, Christ is born even if we don’t make room. Jesus said that the kingdom of God is within you. Jesus said that by reaching out to others we are reaching out to him.